Sociology of Development (Sociology 2091) –
Fall 2003
Instructor: Dr. Randall Kuhn
Class: MWF
E-mail Address: kuhnr@colorado.edu
Office:
Phone: (303) 735-5601
Office Hours: Wednesdays
Course Home page: http://adder.colorado.edu/~kuhnr/soc2091
This course provides a survey of issues relating to
national, community, and human development in Less Developed Countries (LDCs).
We will focus on understanding the complex role of individuals, families,
communities, and the state in determining social and economic outcomes within
the LDC context. In addition to providing a general understanding of the levels
of analysis relevant to the Sociology of Development, the material will at
times focus on specific issues such as inequality, risk, poverty,
migration, gender, famine and the environment. We close the course by looking
beyond the technical and theoretical aspects of development to address the
meaning and importance of development as a goal in itself, and the role of
identity and agency in the study of development.
Much of the knowledge you gain in this course will
ideally hold substantial relevance to our experiences as residents of a More
Developed Society. First, this society,
like all MDCs, was once not so developed. Second, trade, communication, wars, travel
and other forms of interaction with LDCs shape every aspect of the way we live
our lives, and how we can expect to live our lives in the future. Finally, much of the material of the role of
governance, communities, families, markets, and institutions in generating
citizens’ security, justice, and well-being grows increasingly relevant in MDCs, especially the US, as the size of government social
safety nets grows smaller.
Although development is regarded as a major sub-field of
sociology in
My personal background is in social demography,
international development, migration and the family. Most of my research has focused on
rural-urban migration, intergenerational support relationships and social networks
in
The class meets MWF, 2-250pm in Humanities 125. Class periods will be devoted to a
combination of lectures, group discussions, and films. With such a short class time, you can expect
that we will move fairly “efficiently”. If
you have any problems or concerns about the pace, please let me know in
person. If you have specific physical,
psychiatric, or learning disabilities and require accommodations, please let me
know early in the semester so that your learning needs may be appropriately
met.
Lectures: Most of these concepts I will address in lectures are straightforward, and will often look a lot like the headlines in your daily newspaper. A more important goal of the lectures is to help you appreciate the relationships between different levels of analysis in determining development outcomes, and the relevance of specific levels and frameworks to the focus topics which emerge throughout the course. Nothing I lecture about is a well-kept secret, so Power Point slides of my lectures will be available on the course home page shortly after a lecture is completed. I will also provide a summary of the lecture in advance, either on-line or as a handout before class.
Discussions: As I suggest above, the goal of discussion will be to address the readings, and to integrate between levels of analysis, and between focus topics and more general issues. The nature of our group discussions will depend to some extent on the ultimate size of the course, the enthusiasm of the group, and of course the acoustics of our “smart” classroom. We may end up splitting into discussion groups, but hopefully we will all interact as one big happy group. As the old Nigerian Proverb (not Hillary Clinton) states: “It takes a village to raise a child”.
Films: Short documentary films will be strewn throughout the length of the course. I will also be arranging to show one or two of my favorite development-related films on evenings during the semester, for extra credit.
The primary written sources will be an assortment of readings listed here on the syllabus. I trust this will make the course a more interesting experience than if we were using a boring textbook, but it will also make things more challenging. You may not need to keep on top of the readings to pass or even to keep up, but you will need to read them if you expect to get much out of the course. The readings will offer a diverse set of perspectives, some of which are bound to offend you, but perhaps not your neighbor. Please persevere, please express any doubts you have about the paper or the choice of paper in the open discussion period, and please be respectful to yourselves, your classmates, and your professor. In total, the reading load should average 30 pages per class period.
My goal is not to make you spend money or run all over town
looking for reading materials. Since CU
has already paid for the rights to most of these materials, it is absurd to
make you pay for the campus copy center to acquire the rights and produce a bulkpack. A majority of the papers for the course are available
on JStor, Ingenta, or
another of the subscription journal archives accessible through the
Book: I think it’s quite useful to place the ideas of
a course in the framework of a novel or some other work of fiction. Being dissatisfied with most of the “
Murakami, Haruki. 2001. Underground:
The
The book is on order at Word is Out Books at 2015 10th Street, just a couple doors north of Pearl Street. Their phone number is (303) 449-1415. It should be available around September 5th, and they will provide flyers providing you with all the specifics. I will mention this again later on in the class, but you should be aiming to finish the novel around the middle of November.
Films: Documentary films are all well and good, but fictional representations are in my opinion far more powerful. Unfortunately, most feature length movies last 1.5-2 hours, and films from Bollywood, the Indian movie industry, last upwards of 3 hours. I will arrange times later in the semester to watch movies. I will provide refreshments of some sort. I will offer extra credit. I hope it will be enjoyable. Read more below.
Film #1 (September 30,
Film #2 (November 10,
Some of the content of this course may be more challenging or more advanced than in many 2000-level courses, yet it should not be all that difficult to receive a good grade and the overall workload should be manageable. Since the class size is quite small, we will have ample time to go over the material in great detail. My main goal in the class is to give you an opportunity to learn about new issues, settings and viewpoints. As long as you are serious about those goals, you will receive a good grade. I hope that you will go further in pursuing these topics in greater depth in future courses, in thesis projects or in how you read the papers, lead your life, etc. I provide you with plenty of additional readings if you wish to expand on what we learn here.
The CU standard grading scale is as follows:
|
A |
94-100 |
B- |
80-83.9 |
D+ |
67-69.9 |
|
A- |
90-93.9 |
C+ |
77-79.9 |
D |
64-66.9 |
|
B+ |
87-89.9 |
C |
74-76.9 |
D- |
60-63.9 |
|
B |
84-86.9 |
C- |
70-73.9 |
F |
<=59.9 |
You will be graded according to the following criteria:
Midterm (30%): This test will occur on October 17. It will consist of multiple choice, short open-response, and one longer open-response question. The exam must be taken on October 17 at the scheduled time, and in the classroom, 125 Humanities unless other acceptable arrangements have been prepared well in advance. The exam will cover the material in the readings and lectures up to the and including the lectures on Oct 15.
Final (40%): The final will be slightly longer than the mid-term but will follow the same type format and regulations. The final will cover material subsequent to the lecture on October 17 through the end of the course, as well as structuring material from the first four lectures (levels, terms, issues, identity). I mentioned this in class on September 3, but contact me if you have questions about this.
Absolutely no make-ups will be provided for unexcused absences from either of the exams. Anyone not taking the final exam will fail the course.
Essays (20%): You will be assigned two essays in which you will be asked to respond to a question given out in class 2-3 weeks before they are due. The first essay will relate to the material in sections I, II, and III of the course. The second essay will ask you to relate certain aspects of the Murakami book to the accumulated material of the course. Essays should be at least five but no more than seven pages (double-spaced, size 11 or 12 font) in length. Make sure you have a back-up copy of your essay, either on diskette or paper. You will be graded on the quality of your writing as well as the substance.
Participation (10%): We all have our different ways of distinguishing ourselves in class. Some of them will help you receive full credit for participation, some will not (ringing cell phones, for example). I do not expect you to attend 100% of the lectures, and you will not be marked down for a missing a class here and there. I also do not expect you to speak in discussion every single class on every point. Use your judgment. If you suspect that you have missed a lot of class time and are concerned about losing points, speak to me and I will let you know my thoughts. If you have difficulty speaking aloud in discussion for any reason whatsoever, come talk to me and we can arrange other ways for you to express your opinions and knowledge.
Extra Credit (up to 5%): As mentioned above, there will be two (perhaps three) films shown somewhere on campus on a weekday evening to be announced shortly after the semester begins. Attend the film and write a short (1.5-3 pages) essay relating the film to the relevant lectures and readings, and you will receive up to 2.5% extra credit per film. The extra credit maxes out at 5%. In other words, perfect essays about two films get you 5%, and thus attendance at the third film will be strictly for your own entertainment pleasure, so please don’t write me another essay either for my entertainment or for additional credit. Say you only receive 4% credit for the first two films, then you could still work your way up to 5% at the third film.
Students are expected to adhere to the
Note: * indicates a reading that is required
preparation for that day’s class
August
25: What are we doing here? Levels of
Analysis.
August
27: Basic Development Issues and Challenges. Defining some Terms.
*Jaffee, David. 1998. Levels of
Socio-economic Development Theory.
*Sen, Amartya. 1998.
“Amartya Sen – Nobel Prize Banquet
Speech”. From Les Prix Nobel.
*World Bank. 2002. World Development Report, 2000/2001.
September
1: Labor Day
September
3: Placing the individual in context.
Identity and Development.
Castells, Manuel. 1999. The
Rise of the Network Society. The
Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. 1.
September
5: Individual-level theories of development. Modernization.
*Jaffee, David. 1998. Levels of
Socio-economic Development Theory.
September 8: Families, Households and The Life-Course. Family terminology. Families and Markets. Families and Resources.
*Thornton, Arland and Thomas Fricke, “Social
Change and the Family: Comparative Perspectives from the West, China and South
Asia”. Sociological Forum, 1987, 2:746-72. (Off-Line
Copy)
Dharmalingam, A. 1994. “Old Age Support: Expectations and Experiences in a South Indian Village.” Population Studies, 48, pp. 5-19. (Off-Line Copy)
September 10: The Family is Dead… Long Live the Family!!
*Mason, Karen Oppenheim. 1992. “Family Change and Support of the Elderly in Asia: What Do We Know?”. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 7(3), pp. 13-32.
September 12: Focus on Risk and Vulnerability
*World Bank. 2002. World Development Report, 2000/2001. Oxford: Oxford University Press. “Chapter 8: Helping Poor People Manage Risk”, pp. 135-159.
*Ellis, Frank. 2000. Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. “Chapter 11: Livelihoods, Diversification and Policies”, pp. 231-241. (Off-Line Copy)
Morduch, Jonathan. 1999. “Between the State and the Market: Can Informal Insurance Patch the Safety Net?”. The World Bank Research Observer, 14(2): 187-207.
September 15: Focus on Health and the Burden of Disease
*Bloom, David and David Canning. May 1999. “The
Health and Wealth of Nations”. In World Health
*Sen, Amartya. 1999. “Health in Development”. Keynote Address to the 52nd World
Health Assembly, World Health Organization.
Sachs, Jeffrey
and Amar A. Hamoudi. 1999. "Economic
Consequences of Health Status: A Review of the Evidence. " Working Paper No. 30, December
1999.
Subramanian, S. V., Paolo Belli, and Ichiro Kawachi. 2002. “The Macroeconomic Determinants of Health”. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, pp. 287-302. (Off-Line Copy)
September 17: Focus on Population and Demographic Change
*Sen, Amartya. 2003.
“Population:
Delusion and Reality”. Asian
Affairs On-Line.
*Becker,
*White, Sarah.
1992. Arguing with the
crocodile: Gender and Class in
*Enloe, Cynthia. 1990. Bananas,
Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. "Chapter
6: Carmen Miranda on My Mind: International Politics of the Banana".
*Trask , Haunani-Kay. 1999. From a Native Daughter: Colonialism
and Sovereignty in
*McIntosh, Alison C. and Jason Finkle. 1995. “The Cairo Conference on Population and Development: A New Paradigm?”. Population and Development Review, 21 (2), 223-260. (Off-Line Copy)
Film: Women and Work in
Guest Lecture: Kyle Drullinger,
fifth-year senior in Economics, talks about his experience working on public
health projects in
*Portes, Alejandro. 1998. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology”. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, pp. 1-24.
Woolcock, Michael. 1998. "Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework," Theory and Society, 27:2, pp. 151-208. (Off-Line Copy)
Film: Do Bigha Zamin. 1953. Directed by Bimal Roy, Starring Balraj Sahni, Nirupa Roy, Ratan Kumar; Music (!!) by Salil Choudhury, Lyrics by Shailendra.
*White, Sarah.
1992. Arguing with the
crocodile: Gender and Class in
*Varshney, Ashutosh. 2002. “Understanding Gujarat Violence”. Items and Issues: Social Science Research Council, 4(1): pp. 1-5.
*Massey,
Stark, Oded. 1982. “Research on Rural-to-Urban Migration in LDCs: The Confusion Frontier and Why We Should Pause to Rethink Afresh”. World Development 10(1):63-70. (Off-Line Copy)
Portes, Alejandro and Julia Sensenbrenner. 1993. “Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action”. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), pp. 1320-1350. (No Electronic Copy Yet)
*Check out Grameen Bank's website, including their credit delivery system and the 16 decisions (with cool illustrations) pledged by Grameen Bank members.
*Sultan, Sonya M. 2003. “Rebuilding Afghanistan from Within”. Changemakers, Online journal of Ashoka Foundation.
Morduch, Jonathan. 1999. “The Microfinance Schism”. World Development, 28(4), pp. 617-629. (Off-Line Copy)
"Sixteen Decisions," VHS 4542
*Crow, Ben and Farhana Sultana. 2002. “Gender, Class, and Access to Water: Three Cases in a Poor and Crowded Delta”. Society and Natural Resources, 15, pp. 709-724.
Students receive Essay #1 Assignment
*Nancy Birdsall. Summer 1998. “Life is Unfair: Inequality in the World” Foreign Policy, 111, pp. 76-93.
*Richardson, John M. and Shinjinee Sen. 1996. "Development and Ethnic Conflict, A Policy Oriented Analysis"
*Perlman, Janice E. 1976. The
Myth of Marginality: Urban Poverty and Politics in Rio de Janeiro.
*World Bank. 2003. World Development Report, 2003.
Lipton, Michael. 1998. “Urban Bias and Inequality”. In Development and Underdevelopment: The Political Economy of Global Inequality (eds. Mitchell A. Seligson and John T. Passé-Smith), Chapter 30, pp. 389-394. (Off-Line Copy)
Roberts, B.R. 1994. "Urbanization, Development, and the Household". In Comparative National Development : Society and Economy in the New Global Order (eds. A. Douglas Kincaid and Alejandro Portes), pp. 199-236. (Off-Line Copy)
*
*Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy”. Foreign Affairs. (Off-Line Copy)
*Reich, Michael R. 2002. “Reshaping the State from Above, from Within, from Below: Implications for Public Health”. Social Science and Medicine, 54(11), pp. 1669-1675. (Off-Line Copy)
*Portes, Alejandro, Manuel Castells
and Lauren A. Benton. 1989. The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and
Less Developed Countries.
Alejandro Portes, “When More Can Be Less: Labor
Standards, Development, and the Informal Economy,” and Vanessa Cartaya, “Informality and Poverty: Causal
*Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism, “Introduction”.
*United Nations Development Program. 2002. Arab Human Development Report 2002.
“Overview: A Future for
All”.
Bellah, Robert N. 1958. Religious Aspects of Modernization in Turkey and Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 64(1): 1-5. (Off-Line Copy)
*“The
Poor and the Rich". The Economist
Sachs, Jeffrey. 2003. "Institutions Matter, but not for Everything," IMF Finance and Development, Vol. 40, No. 2, June 2003.
Video: The Asian Century
Paul Krugman, “The Myth of Asia’s Miracle,” Foreign Affairs 73:6 (1994), pp. 62-78. (Off-Line Copy)
Bearak, Barry.
Gopalan, C. 2001. “Achieving
Household Nutrition Security in Societies in Transition: An Overview”.
Essay #1 Due Date
*Rodrik, Dani. 2002.
“Globalization
for Whom?”.
Harvard Magazine, 104(6), pp. 29-34.
Extra Credit Movie Night #2
Gangs of New York. 2002. Directed by Martin Scorsese, Starring Leonardo DiCaprio (who?), Daniel Day-Lewis, Cameron Diaz. 166 minutes.
*Amin, Samir. 1998. “Specters of Capitalism: A Critique of Current Intellectual Fashions”. Monthly Review. (Off-Line Copy)
Fernando Henrique Cardoso
and Enzo Faletto, “Preface
to the English Edition,” in Dependency and Development in
*Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2001. “Notes and Dispatches, Addis Ababa: Thanks for Nothing”. The Atlantic Monthly, October 2001.
*Sen, Amartya. 2001.
“Ten
Theses on Globalization”. New
Perspectives Quarterly, pp. 9-15.
United Nations Development Programme
(UNDP). “Human
Development in this Age of Globalization”. Chapter 1 in Human
Development Report 1999 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 25-44.
Students receive Essay #2 Assignment
*Gereffi, Gary, Ronie Garcia-Johnson, and Erika Sasser. 2001. “The NGO-Industrial Complex”. Foreign Policy, 125 pp. 56-65. (Off-Line Copy)
*Sassen, Saskia. 2002. “Globalization or Denationalization”. Items and Issues: Social Science Research Council, 4(1): pp. 15-19.
*Sachs, Jeffrey. 2002. "Weapons of Mass Salvation,"
The Economist,
Portes, Alejandro. 1997. “Neoliberalism and the Sociology of Development: Emerging Trends and Unanticipated Facts”. Population and Development Review, 23(2), pp. 229-259. (Off-Line Copy)
*Bob, Clifford. 2002. "Merchants of Morality", Foreign Policy, 129, pp. 36-45. (Off-Line Copy)
*Portes, Alejandro. 1999. “Conclusion: Towards a New World - The Origins and Effects of Transnational Activities”, Ethnic and Racial Studies 22(2), pp. 463-77. (Not Off-Line Yet)
Evans, Peter. 2000. “Fighting Marginalization with Transnational Networks: Counter-Hegemonic Globalization”, Contemporary Sociology, 29, pp. 230-41. (Off-Line Copy)
*Escobar, Arturo. 1997. “The
Making and Unmaking of the Third World Through Development”, Chapter
8 in The Post Development Reader (eds. Majid Rahnema and Victoria Bawtree),
*Frank, Leonard. 1997. “The
Development Game”, Chapter 26 in The Post Development Reader (eds.
Majid Rahnema and Victoria Bawtree),
Discussion of Murakami’s
Film: Ancient Futures:
Learning from Ladakh
Jared Diamond, Gun, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies
(1997). Introduction.
*Rahnema, Majid. 1997. “Towards
Post-Development: Searching for Signposts, a New Language and New Paradigms”,
Afterword in The Post Development Reader (eds.
Majid Rahnema and Victoria Bawtree),
Leys, Colin. 1996.
The Rise and Fall of Development Theory.
*Castells, Manuel. 1999. The
Rise of the Network Society. The
Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. 1.
Murakami Essay Due Date
Kuhn, Randall. 2003. “Identities in Motion: Social Exchange Networks and Rural-Urban Migration in Bangladesh”. Contributions to Indian Sociology 37(1&2), pp. 311-337.
Sen, Amartya.